About Me

Name: Michelle Nevada
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

"Give 'em Hevron" Ross Named as Advisor to Hillary--This is a "Pro-Israel" Appointment?

B”H

OMG!  Am I living in "Groundhog Day" world???

Next, they will dig Arafat up so that he can negotiate with Ross.  Not that it would make any difference if they did.  Arafat agreed to a whole lot of stuff that he never did anyway.

I don't understand how everyone seems to think that Ross is a good pick for Israel.  I guess it beats a lot of other choices that Obama could have made, but I am wondering if Ross’s “hawkish” reputation is serving as a fig-leaf for Obama’s pro-Arab predilections, and, if you still have a memory--not a very good fig leaf at that. 

Ross was the architect of Oslo 2, which was a complete flop—calling for the PA to do a bunch of stuff (like reworking their charter so that it didn’t call for the destruction of Israel, changing the school system so that they weren’t educating their kids to hate Jews, etc.), and the PA did nothing of the sort. 

Then, he went along as if the PA had done everything they were supposed to do, and he engineered the give-away of Hevron to the arabs, including:

   1. An IDF withdrawal of 80% of Hebron within ten days.
   2. By March 7 Israel would begin the first phase of withdrawal from rural areas in the West Bank.
   3. Eight months after the first stage, Israel would carry out the second phase of the withdrawal.
   4. The third phase was to have been completed before mid-1998. In this phase Israel would withdraw from the remaining parts of the West Bank apart from "settlements and military locations."

This, of course, lead to Netanyahu losing the government and destroying his reputation for at least six months until most of the sheep of Israel forgot all about his treachery because he looks good in a suit and accepted the increasing level of violence, the destruction of much of the holy city of Hevron, and rewarded the arabs for the riots of 1929. 

This might be considered a “great achievement for peace” for Obama—but not for Israel.  It was a complete “land for peace” agreement, and, of course, we are well aware that that concept does not work at all.  It also introduced that nice tradition of releasing every murdering terrorist we have in our prisons in exchange for a handshake, a smile, and a wink so that they can go back to their former profession and kill more Jews. (A tradition that seems to have spread to Obama and how he regards the terrorists we have in caged in Cuba, right?)

Ross is no friend of Israel.  He is no “Hawk.”  He is just another “give the arabs whatever they want” lackey of the US State Department.

He will attempt to force all of the evil of Oslo back upon Israel and more--and with Bibi at the reins, it is all looking like a replay of a bad copy of the same old movie starring the same washed-up actors as they attempt to regain the full folly of their youth.

I’m disgusted that Ross is back.  I’m disgusted that we have forgotten all the evil he did.  I’m disgusted that Israel National News would dare print that he is “Seen in US as Pro-Israel Appointment.”  I am wondering WHO in the US would see him as “Pro-Israel,” and I am wondering exactly what “Pro-Israel” means if that is the case.

M
-----
Dennis Ross Joins State Dept as Special Adviser to Clinton

http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/130108
by Hana Levi Julian

(IsraelNN.com) Former senior U.S. diplomat Dennis Ross has been pressed back into service as Special Adviser on Persian Gulf affairs to U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. The position includes advising Clinton on issues surrounding Iran, the Gulf region, the broader Middle East region, and southwest Asia.

The appointment was announced Monday by State Department spokesman Robert Wood, who noted,"This is a region in which America is fighting two wars and facing challenges of ongoing conflict, terror, proliferation, access to energy, economic development and strengthening democracy and the rule of law."

He added that "Ambassador Ross brings a wealth of experience not just to issues within the region but also to larger political-military challenges that flow from the area and have an impact outside of the Gulf and Southwest Asia, and the secretary looks forward to drawing on that experience and diplomatic perspective."

U.S. Senator George Mitchell was appointed last month as the Obama administration's special envoy to the Middle East. Equally seasoned diplomat Richard Holbrooke was appointed as special envoy to Afghanistan and Pakistan.

Seen in U.S. as Pro-Israel Appointment
Ross helped write the speech delivered at the AIPAC convention by President Barack Obama during his campaign last year, and served as an official adviser to the campaign.

The long-time diplomat has said he believes that negotiations between the Jewish State and the Palestinian Authority should be contingent on the PA taking responsibility for preventing violence in any location vacated by Israel.

Ross has said he is opposed to unilateral withdrawals and noted in the past that Israel's withdrawal from Lebanon in 2000 strengthened the position of the Hizbullah terrorist organization there. He also opposes setting a timeline for creation of a PA state, according to Who Runs Government.

The new Special Adviser supports Israel's right to build a security barrier for self-defense, but believes it should be temporary.

He also reportedly supports peace talks between Syria and Israel and negotiations over the Golan Heights.

In addition, Ross has said he believes that Iran must be stopped at all costs from "going nuclear."

No Novice to Middle East Diplomacy
The appointment returns Ross to a forum with which he is exceedingly familiar, having served in a similar capacity under Clinton's husband Bill when he was president.

As Middle East coordinator during the Clinton administration, Dennis Ross served from 1993 to 2001 as the top negotiator for the U.S. between Israel and the Palestinian Authority, headed at that time by Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) chairman Yasser Arafat.

Ross also served under President Ronald Reagan in 1981 as the director of Near East and South Asian Affairs for the administration's national security staff.

In addition, Ross served the Bush administration as well – that is, the administration of President George H. Bush, former President George W. Bush's father. During those years, Ross worked as the director of the State Department's Policy Planning office under then-U.S. Secretary of State James Baker.

Ross left government service in the year 2000 to head the Washington Institute for Near East Policy, a think tank described by Who Runs Government as "hawkish" and "with a pro-Israeli bent."  Together with New York Times columnist Thomas L. Friedman, Ross founded the Kol Shalom synagogue in Rockville, Maryland in 2002.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Yawn. Peres Chooses Bibi. Now Let's See What Happens . . .

B"H

So far this means absolutely nothing.  First, Bibi is mumbling everything he can think of in order to please anyone he might have to negotiate with to make his government, so don't start thinking that anything he is suggesting has even the slightest bit of significance.

Second, until we see the coalition he makes, all bets are off.

If Livni sticks to her guns (remember what they say about a spurned woman), then Bibi is left with Avigor Lieberman's party and a rag-tag assortment of smaller parties. 

My bet is that he will try to "balance" one against the other (think divide and conquer) and he can have the most influence.  So, to balance Lieberman, he will tap labor. 

27 Likud
15 Yisrael B.
13 Labor
----
55

OK, now he needs to  seal the majority for his coalition.

Shas is easily bought off with welfare and child allotments, so they aren't a problem as long as they don't demand the education portfolio.  They already pledged their support, and they don't need to be balanced because they are basically the lap-dog of any government who gives them money.  So, that's an easy 11 mandates--making a not-so-comfortable majority of 66.

With the inclusion of UTJ (4 mandates), balanced with the National Union (5 mandates), he can easily get a very strong coalition without even worrying about what the nationalist Bayit Yehudi party (3 mandates) wants in the government--which, I'm sure, is what he wants.  After all, you can't carve up Israel like a Pashal Offering to the Arabs if you have to answer to a nationalist party in the government coalition!

Bayit Yehudi will probably want in, followed quickly by leaving the coalition over this or that planned expulsion of Jews (we know Bibi will do this, this is obvious.  After all, how else will he qualify for his own talk-show from CNN or MSNBC after his PM position if he doesn't destroy Israel?  We must understand, always, that Bibi is for Bibi.  If we understand that, we will never be surprised or disappointed by anything he does.)

OK, so that gives Bibi a nice majority coalition government of 78.  Then, even if Lieberman wants to leave in a huff, Bibi will still cover his tuchas with a slim margin of 4 votes for any crazy thing he can come up with.

Let's wait and see, but I bet I am right .  .  . (more "right" than Bibi, at least!).

M
-----
Peres tasks Netanyahu with forming government
http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3674886,00.html

After meeting separately with Likud chairman, Kadima leader Livni, president assigns Netanyahu with establishing next government. Netanyahu calls on Livni, Labor head Barak to join hands with him for the nation's sake

Aviad Glickman
Latest Update: 02.20.09, 15:10 / Israel News

President Shimon Peres announced Friday he has decided to task Likud Chairman Benjamin Netanyahu with forming the next government.

"Most of the factions have expressed their desire to see a broad government being established, and I asked Mr. Netanyahu that this wish will be reflected in the makeup of the government," Peres said at a press conference in his official residence.

"The people of Israel need governmental stability in order to deal with the challenges that lie ahead," the president added.

Netanyahu and Peres during their meeting Friday morning (Photo: Moshe Millner, GPO)

In his speech, Netanyahu referred to the challenges facing Israel: "Iran is developing nuclear weapons and poses the greatest threat to our existence since the War of Independence. Iran's terror wings surround us from the north and south"

The Likud leader called on members of all factions, "those who recommended and those who didn't," to put all the disagreements aside and focus on the good of the state.

Netanyahu urged Kadima Chairman Tzipi Livni and Labor Chairman Ehud Barak to "join hands" with him, and said that he wished to meet with the two first, for the sake of national unity.

Kadima Chairwoman Tzipi Livni called Netanyahu later Friday and told him she was not opposed to a meeting with him. They are scheduled to meet Sunday.

Livni rejects notion of unity government

Earlier, President Peres met separately with Netanyahu and Livni after formal consultations between the president and the faction representatives have ended.

Peres urged both leaders to form a broad national unity government that will include both Likud and Kadima.

Netanyahu, who was the first to meet Peres, told the president that he understood the need for a unity government. "Immediately after you task me with forming the coalition, I will invite Kadima for negotiations," said the Likud leader.

"I'm willing to go far in order to establish such a government," he stated.

Shortly after their meeting concluded, Livni arrived at the president's residence in Jerusalem. After the meeting she said: "Whoever is willing to forsake all his values in order to sit in the coalition is unworthy to sit in that spot. There is a coalition here based on a lack of political vision, a coalition that will not allow me to exercise the way of Kadima.

"A broad coalition has no value if it does not lead the way. I cannot be a cover for a lack of way," added Livni.

Livni's associates stressed that unless Netanyahu agrees to rotation, "there's nothing to talk about."

With the culmination of the talks with Peres Thursday evening, the score stood markedly in Netanyahu's favor with 65 endorsements (from the Likud, Yisrael Beitenu, Shas, United Torah Judaism, the National Union and Habayit Hayehudi).

Meanwhile Livni garnered the support of the 28 members of her own party. Labor, Meretz and the Arab parties chose not to recommend any candidate to Peres.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Jews in Muslim Lands See Synagogues Closed, Suffer Anti-Jewish Attacks, See Governments Condone Jew Bating

B"H

Yup. The AP is at it again. "It's the Gaza War! It's Outrage over the horrible Gaza War!" they trumpet in every story. We know this is BS. We know that anti-Semitism is alive, well, and boiling very close to the surface every single day of the year just waiting for an excuse to show itself.

It's not the war, which was legitimate, carefully waged to prevent civilian deaths, and incomplete. If the war had been completed, we wouldn't have rockets still falling on the heads of innocent Israelis.

This is anti-Semitism pure and undiluted, and the AP is trying to put a fig-leaf over it.

These Jews in Muslim lands have NOTHING TO DO WITH THE GAZA WAR. Most of them, out of fear and coercion have even denounced the war in order to make peace with their co-nationalists. However, this has not helped them one bit because the problem is not the war. The problem is the hatred of Jews.

This is clear from the targets. Did the "protesters" attack Israeli consulates and Israeli government offices? No. They attacked synagogues. They attacked Jews in the streets, in their homes, in their businesses.

The war is simply an excuse for the crowds of people who hate Jews, or who want to blame their problems on Jews to have permission to do so under the banner of "protest against the Gaza war."

Do you think the AP would report that I had a legitimate reason to attack innocent African Americans or attack their churches because I was "protesting" the election of Obama? Do you think the AP would report that I had a legitimate reason to attack Iraninan Americans and attack their Mosques because I was "protesting" the words and actions of the Iranian President?

No.

Why? Because the AP assumes that I should be held to a certain standard of civility. They would expect me to contain my "protests" to legitimate forms of speech, such as carrying a sign or writing letters to the appropriate representatives of whomever I had a problem with.

Not so for arabs.

The allowance for such behavior has completely racist roots. The AP is saying, "Look, these arabs can't act like civilized human beings. They can't be held to the same standards as other people because of their backward religion and culture."

How come the arabs don't protest how the AP portrays them? How come they don't say, "These people who are desecrating the houses of worship and attacking innocent people under the guise of 'protest' are not representatives of the Muslim people!"

But, they won't. I guess self-respect is a lot less important to them than I thought.

M

-----

Jews in Muslim lands anxious over Gaza war
By AMY TEIBEL Associated Press Writer
http://www.elpasotimes.com/nationworld/ci_11715870

CAIRO—Outrage at the Israel war in the Gaza Strip has turned to intimidation and even violence against Jews living in some Muslim lands, raising questions about the stability of these often tiny communities.

In Turkey, Yemen and Indonesia, Muslims have shut down a synagogue, stoned homes and used anti-Semitic slurs. Although the incidents have been isolated, the Jewish minorities in these lands are concerned.

"Before the conflict broke out in Gaza, we were very involved in the community," said Yusron Samba, whose family for years had operated a synagogue in Indonesia that shut down in fear over the war. "Of course we're afraid following strong reaction recently from some Islamic groups questioning our presence here."

The fury over Gaza has centered around the hundreds of Palestinian civilians killed in the war, in which 13 Israelis also died. Israel says it could not avoid killing civilians because Gaza militants operate from residential areas, but critics accuse it of using disproportionate force in its war to halt rocket attacks on its territory.

The steep Palestinian death toll sparked protests across the Muslim world, Europe and in Venezuela, and in some cases, the rage turned to violence. Firebombs were hurled at synagogues in France, Sweden and Belgium, Jews were beaten in England and Norway and an Italian union endorsed a boycott of Jewish-owned shops. In Venezuela, vandals shattered religious objects at a synagogue and spray-painted,

"Jews, get out," on the walls.

In Yemen, where Islamic militancy is on the rise, anti-Israel protesters pelted several Jewish homes with rocks and smashed windows, injuring at least one person, security officials said.

President Ali Abdullah Saleh has offered to give plots of land in the capital, San'a, free of charge to Jews who want to relocate from the provinces, officials said. No one has taken him up on the offer, said the officials, who spoke on condition of anonymity because the offer was made privately in a meeting between the president and Jewish leaders.

As many as 250 of Yemen's estimated 400 Jews are thought to live outside San'a.

In Indonesia, the world's most populous Muslim state, Islamic hard-liners marched to the gates of the country's only synagogue, chanting, "Go to hell, Israel."

"If Israel refuses to stop its attacks and oppression of the Palestinian people, we don't need to defend (the synagogue's) presence here," said Abdusshomad Buchori, who led the protest in the town of Surabaya and has threatened to drive out its Jews. The synagogue has been shuttered since.

In the past, Jews in Surabaya have experienced no hostility, Samba said. But increasingly—probably because of events like the Gaza war—a smattering of swastikas has appeared on the backs of buses, he said.

Because of the hostile reaction, "we're not exposing ourselves to the media right now," he said. "We also report all protests to the police."

Several dozen Jews are thought to be living in Indonesia, descendants of traders from Europe and Iraq.

Jewish leaders in Egypt and Syria were curt when asked about the climate toward Jews in their countries.

"We have no troubles and we don't talk politics," said Carmen Weinstein, head of the Jewish Community in Cairo.

In Syria, Jewish community head Albert Komho said, "There is no fear and there are no threats. We are not involved in any political activity and we are functioning normally."

Jews moved to the Middle East and north Africa after Spain expelled them in the 15th century. Jews were often restricted to separate neighborhoods, had curtailed rights, and sometimes were persecuted. Their condition deteriorated sharply in the first half of the 20th century as a result of Arab nationalism and Israel's impending establishment. Hundreds of thousands fled or were expelled from Arab lands around the time of Israel's 1948 creation, and today, only several tens of thousands remain.

Some communities are tiny, numbering about 100 in Syria and less than a dozen in Baghdad. The biggest concentrations are in Turkey and Iran, where Jews enjoy the stated protection of Islamic governments.

The Iranian Jewish community went out of its way to distance itself from Israel during the Gaza fighting, issuing a statement expressing solidarity with the Palestinians and condemning the Israeli offensive. "The inhuman behavior of the Zionist regime contradicts the religious teachings" of the Jewish faith, the statement said.

A group of Iranian Jews, including Jewish lawmaker Siamak Mara-Sedq, protested against the war in front of the U.N. office in Tehran in late December.

Turkey is Israel's best friend in the Muslim world, but the greatest turbulence over the Gaza war has taken place there. Earlier this month, Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan confronted Israeli President Shimon Peres over the high Palestinian civilian death toll, before storming off the stage they shared at a high-profile forum in Davos, Switzerland.

Some of Turkey's 23,000 Jews, however, were more alarmed by a government-ordered minute of silence in schools for Gaza's dead, which they fear is a sign that the Islamic-leaning government's declared intolerance of anti-Semitism might waver. Erdogan's recent observation that the Ottoman Empire welcomed Jews also rankled many who took it to mean that Turkey considered them guests, not citizens.

Although Turkish fury was mostly directed at Israel, a few Turkish protesters held placards with anti-Semitic messages. Turkish media showed a photograph of three men in front of the office of a cultural association, holding a dog and a sign saying, "Dogs are allowed, but Jews and Armenians aren't."

Jewish community leaders say hundreds of anti-Semitic writings have appeared in Turkish media, and that prosecutors have failed to take legal action.

"Everyone can criticize the policies of Israel, we respect that," Silvyo Ovadya, head of the Jewish community in Turkey, told the Milliyet newspaper. "However, every speech criticizing Israel has a tendency to turn into cries of 'Damn Jews.' I don't recall such an atmosphere previously."

Erdogan has tried to reassure Turkey's Jews, who live in a country of more than 70 million Muslims, that criticism of Israel does not amount to an attack on Jews and their faith.

"There has been no anti-Semitism in the history of this country," Erdogan told ruling party lawmakers last week. "As a minority, they're our citizens. Both their security and the right to observe their faith are under our guarantee."


Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

"Right Wing" likely to take reigns in Israel's new coalition government

B”H

I guess this is what passes for “Suspense” lately? How, exactly, did the inevitable coronation of Bibi Netanyau become “suspense”?

We all know that Tzippi can’t make a coalition (she already tried and failed. Isn’t that why we went to early elections?). Lieberman wants to go with a winner not a loser--even if Bibi IS a weasel.

We all knew, last year, that we would be stuck with Bibi again, that he was the only “choice” we were getting.  We can't ever get something truly right wing these days--just people posing as right wingers to get elected.

Is Bibi better than Livni? Probably not. The only difference that I see between the two is that Livni is stupid enough to say what she is going to do to destroy Israel and Bibi keeps it to himself.

So here we are back at START again with Bibi. Do you think he has learned one thing from his past? I doubt it. He is already talking about giving away land, and he hasn’t even started in office. He talks tough, but when the spoon hits the pudding, he puts his tail between his legs, tosses the arabs whatever they want, and runs. That’s his history, his story, his failure.

I guess this isn’t a good time to bring up that really scary prophecy in Drosnin's "The Bible Code," right? You know, the one that says that Bibi will travel to Syria early in his term and will be, G-d forbid, assassinated? Everyone used that section of the book to say that Drosnin’s predictions were completely bogus—but then they weren’t counting on Bibi going back into the PM slot, now were they?

Even though I don’t put any stock in these Bible Code “prophecies” that have been so popular—Drosnin’s prediction has been tugging at my mind through this whole election process. I sure hope he is wrong. The last thing we need is a Martyred Bibi. Ugh. I don’t want to even think about how horrible that would be.

So, all hail PM Bibi, Israeli Politician Extraordinaire! Let’s all pray for the guy. Maybe he can grow a backbone and some BZ before it’s too late for us and our little country that could.

M

-----

Lieberman Breaks Suspense: Recommends Netanyah

http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/130032
by Hillel Fendel


(IsraelNN.com) Ending nine days of guessing around the country, Avigdor Lieberman, enjoying the kingmaker role as head of Israel’s third-largest party, recommends that Binyamin Netanyahu form the country’s next government.

In his meeting with President Shimon Peres Thursday morning , the head of Yisrael Beiteinu (Israel Our Home) added that this recommendation applies only if Netanyahu tries to form a national unity government with Kadima and Yisrael Beiteinu. This part of his recommendation, however, carries no official weight.

"Netanyahu and Livni must sit together in the government, without rotation," Lieberman told Peres. "A government of 65 MKs [with only the nationalist and religious parties, as well as Yisrael Beiteinu] will be nothing more than a 'survival' government. The three large parties must first form a government, and then the other parties will be invited to join."

Peres is in the midst of a round of meetings with leaders and representatives of all of the Knesset parties, hearing their recommendations on who should form Israel’s next government. Lieberman’s recommendation gives Netanyahu an outright majority of the incoming Knesset, simplifying Peres’s job.

Guessing Continues
The guessing game is not over, however. Will Netanyahu try to form a unity government with Kadima, as he has said he would do, or will he settle for a nationalist government of 65 MKs with Lieberman and the religious and nationalist parties?

More questions: If Netanyahu chooses a unity government, will he begin the negotiations with Kadima - or will he give his natural partners “first dibs”? And what about Kadima itself – is it interested in joining a Netanyahu-led government, or will it remain in the Opposition, as leader Tzipi Livni has said? Livni has said that she will agree only to a unity government that includes a rotation agreement between her and Netanyahu as Prime Minister - a scenario the Likud has ruled out. And will Kadima split up, with some MKs joining Netanyahu and others remaining in the Opposition?

The Lieberman Enigma
Lieberman served as a top aide to Netanyahu in the past, continues to talk with him frequently, and his voters are strongly right-wing and nationalist. Despite these niceties, he did not makes things easy for the nationalist camp, and did not state aloud that he would recommend Netanyahu until nearly the last minute.

It is not clear exactly what Lieberman’s considerations are. Some have said that his fence-sitting was related to the 8-year-old police investigation against him, which has recently gained steam once again. Just yesterday, police sources met with Attorney General Menachem Mazuz and told him that the accusations against Lieberman “are becoming more weighty.” Lieberman may or may not have been weighing which government – either left-center, or nationalist – might mean better chances for the closing of the case. He was also likely considering which ministerial portfolios the investigation prevents him from receiving. After the previous elections, in 1996, Mazuz announced that because of the investigation against Lieberman, he was not eligible to serve as Public Security Minister.

Adding to the mystery were some of Lieberman’s political moves in the past. After being left out of Olmert’s government in early 2006, he joined the government several months later, and then abruptly left just over a year later.

Despite Lieberman’s strongly hawkish reputation, his stance against further withdrawals is far from absolute. After the 2006 elections, he outlined on Channel Two Television the circumstances under which his party would oppose another unilateral withdrawal. “If it will be a withdrawal with no benefit, no compensation and no improvement in the security situation, then we will not be partners," he said.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »